The Steel Magnolia

The other day I was browsing the Signs of the Times Forum and came across an interesting take on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion - something I hadn’t thought about. It’s written by one of the Signs editors, Henry See who has, apparently, taken to calling it the “Protocols of the Pathocrats” in light of the information they have published on Ponerology written by Polish psychologist, Andrew Lobaczewski. Mr. See writes:

In reading through the Protocols of the Pathocrats today, I found the following in Protocol 9. Remember, these were written over one hundred years ago. All I have changed is the reference to normal people to bring it line with our research on pathocracy.

13. You may say that the NORMAL PEOPLE will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a maneuver of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail—the undergrounds, metropolitans, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organizations and archives.

Now THAT gave me the real heebie jeebies! I have read Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s book: 9/11: The Ultimate Truth, and she suggests that MOSSAD was the prime mover in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and that further, that Flight 77, with Barbara Olsen onboard was never inteded to be hijacked, much less to hit the Pentagon (which she says it didn’t, by the way.) She suggests that the hijacking of Flight 77 was a “special surprise” that MOSSAD sprung on the Neocons and that it was part of a blackmail package. Apparently, it was an “insurance policy” that MOSSAD took out against the Neocons to ensure that they would never turn on Israel. So, the Neocons were forced to say that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon because it was, after all, missing when in fact, something else was supposed to have hit it according to plan ( and did, in fact hit it, and Rumsfeld gave it away when he referred to the “missile” that hit the Pentagon).

The question is: what kind of blackmail could MOSSAD have used against the NEOCONS to get them to agree to claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon when it didn’t and wasn’t even planned to?

The above passage from the Protocols of the Pathocrats (I rather like the sound of that) suggests what that might be. If you put that together with the long, ongoing Israeli spying that has been going on in the U.S. for years, (Pollard is just the tip of the ice-berg), along with the long history of False Flag ops that MOSSAD is famous for, you can pretty well figure out that there probabaly are plenty of bombs planted all over the U.S.

What else can explain the control Israel has over the U.S. government?

Anyway, back to the Protocols

And then this:

Independently of this, we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president, as chief of the whole army of the country, must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution.

And again:

In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the normal people in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan.

Another that pertains to what Lobaczewski calls the special knowledge of psychopaths about normal people:

We must search out in the very finest shades of expression and the knotty points of the lexicon of law justification for those cases where we shall have to pronounce judgments that might appear abnormally audacious and unjust, for it is important that these resolutions should be set forth in expressions that shall seem to be the most exalted moral principles cast into legal form. Our directorate must surround itself with all these forces of civilization among which it will have to work. It will surround itself with publicists, practical jurists, administrators, diplomats and, finally, with persons prepared by a special super-educational training IN OUR SPECIAL SCHOOLS. These persons will have consonance of all the secrets of the social structure, they will know all the languages that can be made up by political alphabets and words; they will be made acquainted with the whole underside of human nature, with all its sensitive chords on which they will have to play. These chords are the cast of mind of the NORMAL PEOPLE, their tendencies, short-comings, vices and qualities, the particularities of classes and conditions.

Here is Lobaczewski:

In spite of their deficiencies in normal psychological and moral knowledge, they develop and then have at their disposal a knowledge of their own, something lacked by people with a natural world-view. They learn to recognize each other in a crowd as early as childhood, and they develop an awareness of the existence of other individuals similar to them. They also become conscious of being different from the world of those other people surrounding them. They view us from a certain distance, like a para-specific variety. Natural human reactions— which often fail to elicit interest because they are considered self-evident—strike them as strange and, therefore, interesting, even comical. They therefore observe us, deriving conclusions, forming their different world of concepts. They become experts in our weaknesses and sometimes effect heartless experiments. The suffering and injustice they cause inspire no guilt within them, since they are a result of their being different and apply only to “those other” people they perceive to be not quite conspecific. Neither a normal person nor our natural world-view can perceive or properly evaluate the existence of this world of different concepts.

A researcher into such phenomena can glean a similar deviant knowledge through long-term studies of the personalities of such people, using it with some difficulty, like a foreign language. As we shall see below, a similar practical skill becomes rather widespread in nations afflicted by that macrosocial pathological phenomenon wherein this anomaly plays the inspiring role. A normal person can wind up speaking their conceptual language, but the psychopath shall never be able to incorporate the world-view of a normal person, although they often try to do so all their lives. The product of their efforts is only a role and a mask behind which they hide their deviant reality.

and

I had to study subjects bordering on psychology and psychopathology in order to answer the questions arising from our observations; scientific neglect in these areas proved an obstacle difficult to overcome. At the same time, someone guided by special knowledge apparently vacated the libraries of anything we could have found on the topic.

Analyzing these occurrences now in hindsight, we could say that the “professor” was dangling bait over our heads, based on the psychopaths’s above-mentioned specific psychological knowledge. He knew in advance that he would fish out amenable individuals but the limited numbers disappointed him. The transpersonification process generally took hold whenever an individual’s instinctive substratum was marked by pallor or some deficits. To a lesser extent, it also worked among people who manifested other deficiencies, also the state provoked within them was partially impermanent, being largely the result of psychopathological induction.

This knowledge about the existence of susceptible individuals and how to work on them will continue being a tool for world conquest as long as it remains the secret of such “professors”. When it becomes skillfully popularized science, it will help nations develop immunity. But none of us knew this at the time.

It’s all very scary stuff because it seems to describe exactly what is going on in the U.S. today.

Does that suggest that there is a higher percentage of psychopaths and other deviants among Jews than among other groups? That’s very possible, in my opinion. After all, the peaceful ones stood in line for the gas chambers because they were told to behave decently by their rabbis who were under the control of the Zionists in kahoots with the Nazis who only saved certain groups, mainly those that got behind the Zionist agenda. And certainly, if there is anything psychopathic on this planet, it is Zionism.

So maybe that was the plan behind the Holocaust? Culling the Jewish herd of “normal people,” and only leaving the psychopaths?