The Steel Magnolia

You know, there are days when I just want to Cry to Heaven: “I want OFF this Rock!”

Today is one of those days. Here’s what set it off:

Search for the truth long enough, post a little about it, and you will be contacted. Apparently no blog is small enough to avoid attention.

I started a blog, 9.11 Soundbytes, to post quotes from the memory hole on the terrorist attack as I found them. I received an interesting email from Mark Robinowitz of oilempire.us regarding the blog, and I will share a small fraction of it with you.

My guess is that he regularly sends something similar to all sites that link to The Pentagon Strike Video. The email makes him appear more like a paid COINTELPRO agent, or so I think.

Stumbled upon your site -

the “Pentagon Strike” video has been debunked by many of the best
writers on 9/11 complicity issues - such as the author of the
911research site you list. […]

Now for a bit of context. The Pentagon has all but announced that they are using propaganda:

U.S. government planting propaganda and misleading stories in the international media

BBC News
By Tom Carver
Wednesday, 20 February, 2002
Washington correspondent

The Pentagon is toying with the idea of black propaganda.

As part of George Bush’s war on terrorism, the military is thinking of
planting propaganda and misleading stories in the international media.

A new department has been set up inside the Pentagon with the Orwellian
title of the Office of Strategic Influence.

It is well funded, is being run by a general and its aim is to influence
public opinion abroad.

Black and white

It has been canvassing opinion within the Pentagon on what it should do. […]

What is so darn interesting is that this blog I have quoted from above links to a site that claims to have interviewed Laura Knight Jadczyk, the woman I keep encountering in my searches for answers to “how to get off this rock.” In this case, it really begins to look like she is onto something or there wouldn’t be so much effort to silence her. At this other site, Perfect Infidel, there is this:

Well, it seems that Knight-Jadczyk has really stirred up the pooh! Her research group is responsible for the Pentagon Strike video that cranked up the Washington Post!

All of this made me even more curious and my search turned up some fascinating items.

It seems that the Pentagon Strike video came out on August 23rd. Probably nobody really noticed it at that point, but it hit a chord of response in the hearts of millions of people. They began to madly download and forward the incredibly concise and well-done piece to their friends and relatives. Latest stats on how many people have viewed it to date are 300 MILLION!

Apparently it even landed in the email box of the Editor of the Washington Post. Or so the story goes as told by Knight-Jadczyk when I contacted her for clarification. She further told me:

What really gave me the creeps was the fact that George decided to make a previously unscheduled campaign stop in my little home town in Florida right after the post article came out. Nnotice the timing here:

August 23rd: Pentagon Strike Video which propagates wildly for a month

September 21st: First contact by Carol Morello of the Washington Post

October 7th: Washington Post article

October 19th: George Bush visits New Port Richey

What really gave us the creeps was knowing that, if they hadn’t seen it before, certainly George and Dick and the gang were watching the Pentagon Strike video after the Washington Post wrote an article about it.

My initial feeling was that Dubya’s visit to my little home town - certainly of NO importance on the campaign trail - was deliberately done to send a message to me.

As to exactly what Carol Morello wrote to me, here is the pertinent passage:

“A couple of editors here saw the video/film, and I was asked to find out what I could about it.

“As you can imagine, we continue to have an intense interest on the attack on the Pentagon and the people who were affected.

“I’ve just begun reporting, so it would be premature to tell you what “perspective” my story would have. My initial impressions are that the questions and theories expressed in the video got a spurt of attention in early 2002, after the publication of a best selling book in France, then the furor died down for a while, and now they have re-emerged with the extraordinarily wide dissemination of this video on the Internet.

“The 911 Commission report appears to have done little to dampen the controversy. I hoped to speak to you about how and why you posted it on your web site, what kind of response you’ve received and what you think about it. I’m also planning to speak to some academics, and groups representing survivors and families from 9/11. And I was wondering if you had any idea who put the video together, and how I might contact him or her. It appears it initially came out of the UK.”

Notice that she attributes the resurgance of interest in the “Pentagate” problem to the Pentagon Strike video.

Can we say “damage control?”

And if there is damage control, then that means there is damage.

Well, that’s bad enough, right? But wait, it gets worse! Perfect Infidel writes her own story as a preface to this and it is chilling in its implications:

[…] The dinner itself was “normal” in every respect, and MOST of the conversation was also “normal.” It only got strange when politics - including the subject of George Bush and 9-11 - was brought up.

Our friends who circulate socially among various government officials brought out some photos to show of a recent private party. Among the attendees of said party - which I reiterate, was private and not an “official function,” was the brother of Vladimir Putin! There was the usual grouping of various ministers, AND one of the most powerful men in the Financial World (and here I don’t mean America, I mean the GLOBAL Financial world!)

What was interesting about these photos was the obvious camaraderie of these individuals depicted in the photographs. There was Vlad’s brother whooping it up with what were obviously close pals in France.

Hmmmm…

So, of course I asked about this. What came next was, in a sense, quite shocking. It seems that it is common knowledge in these circles that Russian satellites photographed a ship-launched craft (seems to have been a drone type plane rather than a missle) that ended up impacting the Pentagon on Sept 11, 2001, and that, for various reasons this information has been withheld from the public.

I was naturally startled to hear this even though I have long held the opinion that it was NOT a commercial jetliner that hit the Pentagon. I think the thing that startled me was the fact that, if Russia (and perhaps other countries with satellites?) had proof that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, why weren’t they revealing this?

It was explained to me that during part of the time George Bush was “incommunicado” on September 11, 2001, he was on the phone to Putin “negotiating.” That was a polite way of saying “blackmailing.” Apparently, Bush, by way of MOSSAD and/or the CIA had enough goods on Vlad to keep him silent.

Now THAT explains why Putin has not responded publicly to the rather obnoxious criticisms of Russia made by Bush and Condi Rice.

In any event, it was explained to me further that these satellite photos HAD been revealed to Thierry Meyssan who was asked by either French or Russian intell to write his book “Pentagate” to “leak” the info that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. His instructions were, apparently, that he had to “make the case” without recourse to official backing; he couldn’t refer to the satellite photos.

Well, suddenly, a LOT of things began to make sense.

Indeed, a lot of things begin to make sense. For example, all those so-called 9-11 researchers who are claiming that the people who question whether Flight 77 actually hit the Pentagon are bonkers and are setting up the 9-11 Truth Movement for a fall, have to explain why it is that intelligence agencies of other countries have leaked this prime bit of information? After all, why would they want to make the 9-11 Truth movement look stupid? If they did, if George Bush and Co suddenly came out with all the photos from all the cameras that most certainly filmed whatever hit the pentagon, and this act put a period to all speculation about what really happened on that day, it could only HELP the Neocons in their drive for Global Domination.

Certainly the foreign intell services aren’t interested in doing THAT!

So, logically, if there was any chance that such a leak would ultimately HELP the neocons, it wouldn’t have happened.

Which takes us then to another point made by Perfect Infidel regarding the propagation of disinformation by such as Mike Ruppert and another guy named Mark Rabinowitz or Robinowitz (not sure which is the correct spelling). She says:

This site [Oilempire] lists what it calls “Bogus 9-11 Websites” saying:

The three biggest stories used to alienate the public from 9/11 truth

1. No Planes on 9/11 (Pentagon, North Tower WTC, “pod plane” at South
Tower, Pennsylvania)
2. The Jews Did It (Israel had foreknowledge and possibly played a role,
but that doesn’t justify anti-semitism and Holocaust Denial)
3. The Victims’ Phone Calls Were Faked (a way to keep the 9/11 families
and the skeptics from working together)

why are there bogus 9/11 websites? a mix of malice and incompetence, but
both make real evidence harder to find

Considering the very good case for the involvement of MOSSAD in 9-11, the very good case that the victims phone calls WERE faked, not to mention what I have discovered about satellite photos on 9-11, it sure does look like the Oil Empire Website is a “plant,” so to say.

This takes us back to the original website that I quoted where the author reports that he received an email from this Rabinowitz/Robinowitz guy:

I started a blog, 9.11 Soundbytes, to post quotes from the memory hole on the terrorist attack as I found them. I received an interesting email from Mark Robinowitz of oilempire.us regarding the blog, and I will share a small fraction of it with you.

My guess is that he regularly sends something similar to all sites that link to The Pentagon Strike Video. The email makes him appear more like a paid COINTELPRO agent, or so I think.

Stumbled upon your site -

the “Pentagon Strike” video has been debunked by many of the best
writers on 9/11 complicity issues - such as the author of the
911research site you list. […]

Yes indeedy, it really looks like Laura Knight Jadczyk has stirred up a hornet’s nest. Imagine getting such “personal attention” from Dubya and the Neocons! It fair gives a person the willies, it does!

It also suggests that she must be a lot closer to the truth than anybody else.